Topic on Talk:Lizardskin
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Bullwinkle in the topic "Why keep the people in the dark?" on Talk:Lizardskin.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I don't understand why it is important to keep salient information from the users. I also don't understand why it is important to present confusing/over-stated | + | I don't understand why it is important to keep salient information from the users. I also don't understand why it is important to present confusing/over-stated misleading "facts." |
Some players are interested in min/max. Before end-game exotic materials are available, lizardskin has the highest blunt damage rating in the game. Period. The difference is small, but it is there. It is the absolute best available in game until acquisition of exotic late game materials. For min/maxers, this is relevant. Someone may feel one way or another about whether that is significant or not, but it is a fact, and one that certain players might find useful. Why remove that information from the page? It is a fact that should be included. For certain situations where you want your pawn to have maximum blunt protection, such as hunters who fear animal revenge (but aren't worried about bullets), blunt rating can be the critical consideration. Same with certain raids where the attackers are mostly using blunt weapons (not common, but does happen). With this being the one-and-only best-in-early-game leather for blunt protection, that fact is worth mentioning, not hiding. Even if the difference is small enough that some editor might have the opinion that it is an insignificant difference. It is best for certain situations, and that is a fact. Mention it. Also mention the difference is small, fine. But mention it. | Some players are interested in min/max. Before end-game exotic materials are available, lizardskin has the highest blunt damage rating in the game. Period. The difference is small, but it is there. It is the absolute best available in game until acquisition of exotic late game materials. For min/maxers, this is relevant. Someone may feel one way or another about whether that is significant or not, but it is a fact, and one that certain players might find useful. Why remove that information from the page? It is a fact that should be included. For certain situations where you want your pawn to have maximum blunt protection, such as hunters who fear animal revenge (but aren't worried about bullets), blunt rating can be the critical consideration. Same with certain raids where the attackers are mostly using blunt weapons (not common, but does happen). With this being the one-and-only best-in-early-game leather for blunt protection, that fact is worth mentioning, not hiding. Even if the difference is small enough that some editor might have the opinion that it is an insignificant difference. It is best for certain situations, and that is a fact. Mention it. Also mention the difference is small, fine. But mention it. | ||