Topic on Talk:Lizardskin
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Bullwinkle in the topic "Why keep the people in the dark?" on Talk:Lizardskin.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I agree with you that it is important not to imply that lizardskin is better than it is. The facts need to be presented in a way that has context. But when I try to put the facts into the article, they are just simply yanked out, with your personal opinion being the only thing that is allowed to be heard. | I agree with you that it is important not to imply that lizardskin is better than it is. The facts need to be presented in a way that has context. But when I try to put the facts into the article, they are just simply yanked out, with your personal opinion being the only thing that is allowed to be heard. | ||
| − | I respect your rank on this wiki and your right to change anything you don't like. But | + | I respect your rank on this wiki and your right to change anything you don't like. But I disagree with you removing facts, thinking that your opinion is the only thing that should be presented. |
| + | |||
| + | If you think my edit adding the facts misrepresents the situation, I would suggest adding some context, rather than removing factual data that some players might want. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sensitive dependence on initial conditions in a complex system means players need facts. Give them some context, but in the end, it should be up to the reader to decide what is the best path forward for him/her. | ||