Editing Rooms
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 283: | Line 283: | ||
: W<sub>b</sub> triples to 6 | : W<sub>b</sub> triples to 6 | ||
: W<sub>m</sub> only changes from 1 + ln(2) = 1.69 (as above) to 1 + ln(6) = '''2.79''' | : W<sub>m</sub> only changes from 1 + ln(2) = 1.69 (as above) to 1 + ln(6) = '''2.79''' | ||
− | So, while we have | + | So, while we have tripled the ''wealth'', the modified value only increased by about two thirds (ie. it has not even doubled). |
Now triple the wealth again to an absolutely ludicrous 27,000, getting us W<sub>m</sub> = '''3.89''', only about 40% more than the previous value, and only a little more than twice the 1.69 rating that we started out with – in total, the 800% added wealth resulted in only 130% of additional value towards room impressiveness (which is then usually attenuated even more, as explained in the next section). | Now triple the wealth again to an absolutely ludicrous 27,000, getting us W<sub>m</sub> = '''3.89''', only about 40% more than the previous value, and only a little more than twice the 1.69 rating that we started out with – in total, the 800% added wealth resulted in only 130% of additional value towards room impressiveness (which is then usually attenuated even more, as explained in the next section). |