Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Stub"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So the main issues I have putting an error for no reason is: | So the main issues I have putting an error for no reason is: | ||
| − | * There are dozens of articles with just stub. Basically I don't think anyone is gonna update them. It looks even uglier as a viewer becauses | + | * There are dozens of articles with just stub. Basically I don't think anyone is gonna update them. It looks even uglier as a viewer becauses the error is clearly not meant to be seen, but pages tend to not be updated for months at a time |
* (As an editor) Reaching for the | and = keys are annoying to type | * (As an editor) Reaching for the | and = keys are annoying to type | ||
* There are times where I don't know what it is. Putting "general stub" isn't any more helpful tan simply putting the template, it causes the same problem. Therefore, why not let the template do it automatically? | * There are times where I don't know what it is. Putting "general stub" isn't any more helpful tan simply putting the template, it causes the same problem. Therefore, why not let the template do it automatically? | ||
Revision as of 22:10, 18 November 2022
Reason omit error
Probably better to put in a talk page.
So the main issues I have putting an error for no reason is:
- There are dozens of articles with just stub. Basically I don't think anyone is gonna update them. It looks even uglier as a viewer becauses the error is clearly not meant to be seen, but pages tend to not be updated for months at a time
- (As an editor) Reaching for the | and = keys are annoying to type
- There are times where I don't know what it is. Putting "general stub" isn't any more helpful tan simply putting the template, it causes the same problem. Therefore, why not let the template do it automatically?