Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Item infobox"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Test 2) |
m |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
There's really no need to separate the width and height of the items, as is it commonly understood. The items can also be rotated, which renders that detail moot. Keep it as 1x2, for instance.<br>Also, a max width of 220 for the infobox seems about right, as long as bigger items still enlarge that as needed...<br>--[[User:British|British]] ([[User talk:British|talk]]) 08:42, 24 October 2013 (EDT) | There's really no need to separate the width and height of the items, as is it commonly understood. The items can also be rotated, which renders that detail moot. Keep it as 1x2, for instance.<br>Also, a max width of 220 for the infobox seems about right, as long as bigger items still enlarge that as needed...<br>--[[User:British|British]] ([[User talk:British|talk]]) 08:42, 24 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
| − | + | :Template its just template, we can always modify it... not tested big pics, max i used 192px or smaller<br>--[[User:AcDie|AcDie]] ([[User talk:AcDie|talk]]) 18:16, 24 October 2013 (EDT) | |
| − | + | ---- | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | --[[User:AcDie|AcDie]] ([[User talk:AcDie|talk]]) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | ==After test== | ||
It may work, but the caption is not a parameter(such as image, type), and so it's not straight-forward to use...<br>--[[User:British|British]] ([[User talk:British|talk]]) 08:45, 24 October 2013 (EDT) | It may work, but the caption is not a parameter(such as image, type), and so it's not straight-forward to use...<br>--[[User:British|British]] ([[User talk:British|talk]]) 08:45, 24 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::Deal with it little later, we have issue at Main Page, <code>__NOTITLE__</code> shows --[[User:AcDie|AcDie]] ([[User talk:AcDie|talk]]) 09:14, 24 October 2013 (EDT) | + | ::Deal with it little later, we have issue at Main Page, <code>__NOTITLE__</code> shows <br>--[[User:AcDie|AcDie]] ([[User talk:AcDie|talk]]) 09:14, 24 October 2013 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:16, 24 October 2013
I can't seem to be able to have caption/tooltip on the image (as the "Tooltip" parameter is not useful... as a parameter).
Help !
--British (talk) 09:12, 23 October 2013 (EDT)
- as i understand you want
<img src="..." alt="Tooltip here"></img>
when your mouse at image right
--AcDie (talk) 09:29, 23 October 2013 (EDT)
- Not quite.
My Infobox template makes use of imagecaption, and it does work.
I can't make it to work on your infobox, though.
--British (talk) 09:41, 23 October 2013 (EDT)
- Not quite.
- Looking at Template:Structure and I can't understand what role it performs, like caption for youtube videos at frontpage? --AcDie (talk) 09:59, 23 October 2013 (EDT)
- True ALT html tag..
- Looking at Template:Structure and I can't understand what role it performs, like caption for youtube videos at frontpage? --AcDie (talk) 09:59, 23 October 2013 (EDT)
- Template:Structure is a global infobox, since I've added so many parameters as time and needs went by...
It uses standard image manipulation syntax, just like in your test down there.
--British (talk) 10:16, 23 October 2013 (EDT)
- Template:Structure is a global infobox, since I've added so many parameters as time and needs went by...
There's really no need to separate the width and height of the items, as is it commonly understood. The items can also be rotated, which renders that detail moot. Keep it as 1x2, for instance.
Also, a max width of 220 for the infobox seems about right, as long as bigger items still enlarge that as needed...
--British (talk) 08:42, 24 October 2013 (EDT)
- Template its just template, we can always modify it... not tested big pics, max i used 192px or smaller
--AcDie (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2013 (EDT)
After test
It may work, but the caption is not a parameter(such as image, type), and so it's not straight-forward to use...
--British (talk) 08:45, 24 October 2013 (EDT)