Difference between revisions of "Talk:Thoughts"

From RimWorld Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== TOC for long articles ==
 
== TOC for long articles ==
  
The TOC is suppressed in this article, probably because it is mighty long and would overly distort the flow of the top of the page. But how should we deal with this? Either here or more generally for very long articles? It would certainly be beneficial to have one, as this article is very long. But due to the table format (which is informationally very good here), even with <nowiki>{{tocright}}</nowiki> it will distort it quite heftily, especially on narrow screens. Any '''thoughts''' on this? :P
+
The TOC is suppressed in this article, probably because it is mighty long and would overly distort the flow of the top of the page. But how should we deal with this? Either here or more generally for very long articles? It would certainly be beneficial to have one, as this article is very long. But due to the table format (which is informationally very good here), even with <nowiki>{{tocright}}</nowiki> it will distort it quite heftily, especially on narrow screens. Any '''thoughts''' on this? :P -[[User:Pangaea|Pangaea]] ([[User talk:Pangaea|talk]]) 05:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
:Probably not ideal, but I made a stab at it. [[User:Pangaea|Pangaea]] ([[User talk:Pangaea|talk]]) 07:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
== Combine Mood and Thoughts? ==
 +
 
 +
Both articles relate to each other very much, and it would be so much easier to just check forexample the Moods article for all the tables for opinion modifiers and so on, instead of having two seperate articles

Latest revision as of 07:50, 1 September 2020

TOC for long articles[edit]

The TOC is suppressed in this article, probably because it is mighty long and would overly distort the flow of the top of the page. But how should we deal with this? Either here or more generally for very long articles? It would certainly be beneficial to have one, as this article is very long. But due to the table format (which is informationally very good here), even with {{tocright}} it will distort it quite heftily, especially on narrow screens. Any thoughts on this? :P -Pangaea (talk) 05:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Probably not ideal, but I made a stab at it. Pangaea (talk) 07:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Combine Mood and Thoughts?[edit]

Both articles relate to each other very much, and it would be so much easier to just check forexample the Moods article for all the tables for opinion modifiers and so on, instead of having two seperate articles