Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Stub"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Reason omit error: new section) |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* There are dozens of articles with just stub. Basically I don't think anyone is gonna update them. It looks even uglier as a viewer becauses it's clearly not meant to be seen, but it won't be updated for a while. | * There are dozens of articles with just stub. Basically I don't think anyone is gonna update them. It looks even uglier as a viewer becauses it's clearly not meant to be seen, but it won't be updated for a while. | ||
* (As an editor) Reaching for the | and = keys are annoying to type | * (As an editor) Reaching for the | and = keys are annoying to type | ||
| − | * There are times where I don't know what it is. Putting "general stub" isn't any more helpful tan simply putting | + | * There are times where I don't know what it is. Putting "general stub" isn't any more helpful tan simply putting the template, it causes the same problem. Therefore, why not let the template do it automatically? |
Revision as of 22:07, 18 November 2022
Reason omit error
Probably better to put in a talk page.
So the main issues I have putting an error for no reason is:
- There are dozens of articles with just stub. Basically I don't think anyone is gonna update them. It looks even uglier as a viewer becauses it's clearly not meant to be seen, but it won't be updated for a while.
- (As an editor) Reaching for the | and = keys are annoying to type
- There are times where I don't know what it is. Putting "general stub" isn't any more helpful tan simply putting the template, it causes the same problem. Therefore, why not let the template do it automatically?