Difference between revisions of "Template:3O"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | <div style= "float: center; border:solid #000000 5px; margin: 5px;"> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
* Do not provide opinions recklessly. Remember that wikis work by consensus, not a vote. In some cases both sides may have presented valid arguments, or you may disagree with both. Provide the reasoning behind your argument. | * Do not provide opinions recklessly. Remember that wikis work by consensus, not a vote. In some cases both sides may have presented valid arguments, or you may disagree with both. Provide the reasoning behind your argument. | ||
* Write your opinion in a civil and nonjudgmental way. | * Write your opinion in a civil and nonjudgmental way. | ||
| − | |||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
[[Category:Site Maintenance]] | [[Category:Site Maintenance]] | ||
Revision as of 02:12, 9 September 2018
Request for third opinions
This process is neither mandatory nor binding. Rather, it is a voluntary, nonbinding, informal mechanism through which two editors currently in dispute can request an opinion from an uninvolved third editor.
How to providing a third opinions
- Third opinions must be neutral. If you have had dealings with the article or with the editors involved in the dispute that would bias your response, do not offer a third opinion on that dispute.
- Read the arguments of the disputants.
- Do not provide opinions recklessly. Remember that wikis work by consensus, not a vote. In some cases both sides may have presented valid arguments, or you may disagree with both. Provide the reasoning behind your argument.
- Write your opinion in a civil and nonjudgmental way.