Modding Tutorials/Linking XML and C

< Modding Tutorials

Writing custom code is all well and good if you can't force RimWorld to use it! Here are three ways of linking your Code to the XML and vice versa.

Using your C# from XML

A classy design pattern

RimWorld leans heavily on Object Oriented Programming and will often expose the specific class of a Def to the XML. They're often called a workerClass, thingClass, but obviously can be named anything. Keep a look out for these, they're sometimes subtle.

Examples

<BiomeDef>
  <defName>BorealForest</defName>
  <workerClass>BiomeWorker_BorealForest</workerClass>
</BiomeDef>

<inspectorTabs>
  <li>ITab_Art</li><!-- That's a class! -->
</inspectorTabs>

A "Classy" pattern

It is possible to overwrite the default class associated with a Def (or field in a def) by specifying the Class by attribute. The most common usage of this you've undoubtedly seen before is in Components:

<comps>
  <li Class="CompProperties_Forbiddable"/>
</comps>

This class override is more widely applicable than just comps. It's possible to overwrite or specify almost any type you wish. Keep Compatibility in mind when doing this: in the end each object can only be one Class.

Example

<!-- Generate faction base -->
<GenStepDef Class = "MyNameSpace.MyCustomGenStepDefClass"> <!-- Overwrite the GenStepDef Class -->
  <defName>Settlement</defName>
  <order>400</order>
  <genStep Class="GenStep_Settlement"> <!-- you can overwrite almost any type you wish. -->
    <count>1</count>
    <nearMapCenter>true</nearMapCenter>
  </genStep>
  <modExtensions>
    <li Class="MyNameSpace.MyCustomModExtension"> <!-- Aah, the classic li Class. -->
       <isACustomGenStepDefClassAndAModExtensionOverkill>false</isACustomGenStepDefClassAndAModExtensionOverkill>
    </li>
  </modExtensions>
</GenStepDef>

You define yourself

Another possibility is to supply your own type in the XML. The most well-known example of this is Alienraces. The ThingDef_AlienRace inherits from regular ThingDef, and adds the alienRace tag to it. The alienRace tag then holds more information, a sample of which is shown below.

One benefit of this over the annotation method above (the "Classy" pattern) is that the added control and restriction of scope is increased compatibility with over mods. It's theoretically also easier to further subclass the AlienRace def by annotation.

While most implementations have limited themselves to Defs, there is no known technical reason to believe this pattern can't be applied to fields directly.

Example

<AlienRace.ThingDef_AlienRace ParentName="BasePawn">
  <defName>ExampleAlien</defName>
  <label>Alien for example</label>
  <description>This alien is really special.. because it is used as an example</description>
  <!-- regular ThingDef tags go here. -->
  <alienRace>
      <!-- specific alien stuff goes inside the alienRace tag. -->
      <generalSettings>

      </generalSettings>
      <raceRestriction>

      </raceRestriction>
  </alienRace>
</AlienRace.ThingDef_AlienRace>

Serialising custom classes

It may sometimes be required to read/write your own datatype to XML. While we all love long strings with comma separated values, there are many cases where this is not a good idea. For that, RimWorld offers a LoadDataFromXmlCustom method. When RimWorld comes across your type during load, and the class defining that type contains the LoadDataFromXmlCustom, RimWorld will use that method to parse the XML. This is done through the magic of reflection.

Note that this method fails on types that can't have a constructor. In practice, this means you can't serialise structs.

//example taken from https://github.com/LocoNeko/RoadsOfTheRim/blob/master/Source/DefModExtension_RotR_RoadDef.cs
public class RotR_cost
{
    public string name;
    public int count;

    public void LoadDataFromXmlCustom(XmlNode xmlRoot)
    {
        if (xmlRoot.ChildNodes.Count != 1)
        {
            Log.Error("Misconfigured RotR_cost: " + xmlRoot.OuterXml, false);
            return;
        }
        name = xmlRoot.Name;
        count = (int)ParseHelper.FromString(xmlRoot.FirstChild.Value, typeof(int));
    }
}

Common issues

You need to specify your exact Namespace.Class. There are no two ways around it. You also need to supply RimWorld with the assembly containing the type and namespace specified.

Using your XML from C#

There are times you'll need to use a Def or other value defined in XML.

DefOf

Any class with the [DefOf] annotation will automatically have its fields filled with their corresponding Def. You can then access it in other code like you'd access any DefOf, like ThingDefOf. The below example would be used as SomeDef def = MyDefOf.JustOneExampleDefName;.

Advantages:

• It's run-time fast.
• It's easy.
• It moves errors to startup, rather than at runtime. Early warnings save considerable testing and debugging!
  • If there's an error in your code (like a typo in the defName, or a missing Def), it will detect that as soon as the game starts, rather than when it's trying to use it.

Disadvantages:

• DefOfs don't get their fields filled until after the game is done loading Defs.
  • This means using a DefOf before it is properly initialised gets you null - which the DefOf class is supposed to prevent.
• Has a negative influence on startup times.

[DefOf]
public static class MyDefOf
{
    public static SomeDef JustOneExampleDefName;
    public static SomeDef AnotherExampleDefName;
    public static SomeDef YetMoreExampleDefName;

    static MyDefOf()
    {
        DefOfHelper.EnsureInitializedInCtor(typeof(MyDefOf));
    }
}

The fields have to be static and public.

That weird constructor

It's there for your own good. If you're trying to use a Def before RimWorld had a chance to fill the field with a proper reference, it will return null. You don't want that. This constructor warns against that.

DefDatabase

If you only need to use a certain Def occasionally, you can look it up in the DefDatabase directly.

SomeDef def = DefDatabase<SomeDef>.GetNamed("JustOneExampleDefName");

Advantages:

• Is allowed to return null (silent failure is an option).
• Does not require an entire class.
• Is open to string based shenanigans.

Disadvantages:

• Is allowed to return null. If you're not prepared for it to return null, Bad Things Happen.
• Slower than a DefOf.
• Prone to typos.

See also

Hello World - For when your code shouldn't be linked to XML, but does need to be bootstrapped.