Topic on Talk:Mech recharger
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Falmingkitter in the topic "language feels biased in the wrong direction" on Talk:Mech recharger.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Is this supposed to be good? "theoretically a single mech recharger can support five always-active mechs" that's less than the bandwidth of a default mechanitor (6) and almost half the capacity of a default solo mechanitor (Starting with Airwire headset, bandwidth of 9). You almost need 2 separate chargers (@ 200W each) to handle the basics. I'll admit I'm incredibly biased and think mechs are underpowered but would anyone object to making the language more neutral? | Is this supposed to be good? "theoretically a single mech recharger can support five always-active mechs" that's less than the bandwidth of a default mechanitor (6) and almost half the capacity of a default solo mechanitor (Starting with Airwire headset, bandwidth of 9). You almost need 2 separate chargers (@ 200W each) to handle the basics. I'll admit I'm incredibly biased and think mechs are underpowered but would anyone object to making the language more neutral? | ||
| − | ''"As active mechs use 10% of their power per day, and this structure recharges | + | ''"As active mechs use 10% of their power per day, and this structure recharges at a rate of 50% per day, theoretically a single mech recharger can support five always-active mechs"'' |