Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sculptures"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(This page's "Market Value" and all attendant analyses are wrong.) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This page, including its attendant analyses, should be rewritten so that it is not inaccurate. | This page, including its attendant analyses, should be rewritten so that it is not inaccurate. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Thanks for reporting the issue. You're more than welcome to take a stab at fixing it . If not, I'll have a go when I next get time. | ||
| + | : PS you can sign your posts with 4 ~'s like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>in a row, even without an account. - [[User:Harakoni|Harakoni (Wiki Moderator)]] ([[User talk:Harakoni|talk]]) 11:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:14, 28 October 2023
The material table's market value is wrong. The material isn't considered at all except as it modifies other stats. The values under Market Value are correct.
Take a poor wooden statue. The game lists it as having 79 value. This page suggests it market value should be 160 * 1.2 * 0.75 = 144. This is wrong. The formula on Market Value suggests it should have (1.2*50+300*0.7*60*0.0036)*0.75*1 = 79.02 value, which is dead on.
I'm not familiar with the history of Rimworld, but it seems to me perhaps the material value stat is a holdover from an older version of the game?
This page, including its attendant analyses, should be rewritten so that it is not inaccurate.
- Thanks for reporting the issue. You're more than welcome to take a stab at fixing it . If not, I'll have a go when I next get time.
- PS you can sign your posts with 4 ~'s like this: ~~~~in a row, even without an account. - Harakoni (Wiki Moderator) (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)