Difference between revisions of "RimWorld Wiki talk:Community portal"

From RimWorld Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*'''[[Special:LanguageStats|Language statistics]]''' - check it for updates. (For example enter ''ru'' lang code and you see all progress)
 
*'''[[Special:LanguageStats|Language statistics]]''' - check it for updates. (For example enter ''ru'' lang code and you see all progress)
 
&uArr;<span class="sig plainlinks">[[User:AcDie|AcDie]] | [[User talk:AcDie|talk]] &#8226; [[Special:Contributions/AcDie|contribs]] &#124; 06:48, 23 December 2013 [[wikipedia:UTC|UTC]]</span>
 
&uArr;<span class="sig plainlinks">[[User:AcDie|AcDie]] | [[User talk:AcDie|talk]] &#8226; [[Special:Contributions/AcDie|contribs]] &#124; 06:48, 23 December 2013 [[wikipedia:UTC|UTC]]</span>
 +
{{clear}}
 
----
 
----
 +
:You may have problems with editing original pages (e.g [[Controls]] - is original English, but page will redirect you to [[Controls/en]] or other language code. For edit original page you may click to redirect link at header '''OR''' just add ''?action=edit'' to adress filed - http://rimworldwiki.com/Controls?action=edit)
 
::Also we need to do something with templates. Simple translation with include not work, need new solution..
 
::Also we need to do something with templates. Simple translation with include not work, need new solution..
 
&uArr;<span class="sig plainlinks">[[User:AcDie|AcDie]] | [[User talk:AcDie|talk]] &#8226; [[Special:Contributions/AcDie|contribs]] &#124; 06:55, 23 December 2013 [[wikipedia:UTC|UTC]]</span>
 
&uArr;<span class="sig plainlinks">[[User:AcDie|AcDie]] | [[User talk:AcDie|talk]] &#8226; [[Special:Contributions/AcDie|contribs]] &#124; 06:55, 23 December 2013 [[wikipedia:UTC|UTC]]</span>

Revision as of 07:33, 23 December 2013

Translation

AcDie | talkcontribs | 06:48, 23 December 2013 UTC


You may have problems with editing original pages (e.g Controls - is original English, but page will redirect you to Controls/en or other language code. For edit original page you may click to redirect link at header OR just add ?action=edit to adress filed - http://rimworldwiki.com/Controls?action=edit)
Also we need to do something with templates. Simple translation with include not work, need new solution..

AcDie | talkcontribs | 06:55, 23 December 2013 UTC


″Trusted″ group

  • Permission: editing without capcha..

AcDie | talkcontribs | 06:48, 23 December 2013 UTC

Signature template

Template:signature

[show]
With timestamp

{{subst:signature|your_user_name|1}} User | talkcontribs | 03:54, 7 November 2013 UTC

Without timestamp

{{subst:signature|your_user_name|}} User | talkcontribs

AcDie | talkcontribs | 03:59, 7 November 2013 UTC


@AcDie: Regarding color scheme

Hey, You are using colors on pages with gradients and such, but it is hard-coded. Is there a way to have all the colors used refer to one place only (kind of like a configuration file), so that we only have to change the colors at that place, rather than on every single page ? That would help if we ever manage to have a black skin for the wiki...
--British (talk) 10:26, 18 October 2013 (EDT)


Ofc, as I told before, better use CSS for many reasons, 1 is above ^ it is hard-coded. But i don't agree with black/any dark skin for wiki, cuz hard to read + images with white background looks like sh*t.. --AcDie (talk) 11:25, 18 October 2013 (EDT)

There won't be any white background image, so that's not a problem. The wiki we had on Wikia and dark and it was good, and it also was in resonance with the vibe of the game. White backgrounds kill the eyes at night, to boot.
TL;DR: Dark background will happen, one way or the other, so we might as well prepare :]
--British (talk) 12:23, 18 October 2013 (EDT)
MediaWiki:Common.css seems there we can add most used styles--AcDie (talk) 14:19, 18 October 2013 (EDT)
One other downside of this colourscheme is the fact that you cannot tell a link and normal text apart. (unless the link´s broken, of course) I am not drawing the longbow about this, it is quite so noteworthy to know how important it is for readers to notice open options for further research regarding variable subjects. Could I suggest changing the colour of the links to something more appropriate, perhaps some hue of dark purple? -- "Ceterum censeo stultus esse delendam" - Jones-250Comm 13:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)