Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sculptures"

From RimWorld Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Signed the post manually)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
I'm not familiar with the history of Rimworld, but it seems to me perhaps the material value stat is a holdover from an older version of the game?
 
I'm not familiar with the history of Rimworld, but it seems to me perhaps the material value stat is a holdover from an older version of the game?
  
This page, including its attendant analyses, should be rewritten so that it is not inaccurate.
+
This page, including its attendant analyses, should be rewritten so that it is not inaccurate. - [[Special:Contributions/2605:a601:a920:9900:d91c:b9b7:6e11:552e|2605:a601:a920:9900:d91c:b9b7:6e11:552e]] ([[User talk:2605:a601:a920:9900:d91c:b9b7:6e11:552e|talk]]) 06:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
  
 
: Thanks for reporting the issue. You're more than welcome to take a stab at fixing it . If not, I'll have a go when I next get time.  
 
: Thanks for reporting the issue. You're more than welcome to take a stab at fixing it . If not, I'll have a go when I next get time.  
: PS you can sign your posts with 4 ~'s like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>in a row, even without an account. - [[User:Harakoni|Harakoni (Wiki Moderator)]] ([[User talk:Harakoni|talk]]) 11:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
+
: PS you can sign your posts with 4 ~'s in a row like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, even without an account. - [[User:Harakoni|Harakoni (Wiki Moderator)]] ([[User talk:Harakoni|talk]]) 11:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:45, 28 October 2023

The material table's market value is wrong. The material isn't considered at all except as it modifies other stats. The values under Market Value are correct.

Take a poor wooden statue. The game lists it as having 79 value. This page suggests it market value should be 160 * 1.2 * 0.75 = 144. This is wrong. The formula on Market Value suggests it should have (1.2*50+300*0.7*60*0.0036)*0.75*1 = 79.02 value, which is dead on.

I'm not familiar with the history of Rimworld, but it seems to me perhaps the material value stat is a holdover from an older version of the game?

This page, including its attendant analyses, should be rewritten so that it is not inaccurate. - 2605:a601:a920:9900:d91c:b9b7:6e11:552e (talk) 06:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting the issue. You're more than welcome to take a stab at fixing it . If not, I'll have a go when I next get time.
PS you can sign your posts with 4 ~'s in a row like this: ~~~~, even without an account. - Harakoni (Wiki Moderator) (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)