Difference between revisions of "Talk:Table"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I am working on a table that includes all items that can be crafted with a given material (see [[User:Ickputzdirwech/Wood]] for the current progress). Unfortunately it doesn't include the tables, since they have one combined page. I therefore suggest splitting this page. If you have a better solution please let me know, I am fairly unexperienced with wiki templates and that sort of stuff. (I tried adding the information to the redirect pages, but I couldn't get it to work). The argument against splitting this page this would be that the individual pages would have very little information. What is your opinion?--[[User:Ickputzdirwech|Ickputzdirwech]] ([[User talk:Ickputzdirwech|talk]]) 10:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC) | I am working on a table that includes all items that can be crafted with a given material (see [[User:Ickputzdirwech/Wood]] for the current progress). Unfortunately it doesn't include the tables, since they have one combined page. I therefore suggest splitting this page. If you have a better solution please let me know, I am fairly unexperienced with wiki templates and that sort of stuff. (I tried adding the information to the redirect pages, but I couldn't get it to work). The argument against splitting this page this would be that the individual pages would have very little information. What is your opinion?--[[User:Ickputzdirwech|Ickputzdirwech]] ([[User talk:Ickputzdirwech|talk]]) 10:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :That sounds like a good idea to me, you're absolutely right that it'd make templating far far easier to do. To the point where it will probably be necessary eventually anyway. I don't think you can make the redirects work while retaiing hte redict - the property calls will also always follow the redirect afaik. If you're happy to do the split, just have a central Table page, that links to the others and the info common to all variants (e.g. [[Sculpture]] or [[Fine carpet]]) , and then individual pages with the in-game names for each of the actual versions. If you're not comfortable doing it, you'll have to wait until I'm free next which might be as late as next week. [[User:Harakoni|Harakoni]] ([[User talk:Harakoni|talk]]) 12:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:54, 11 June 2021
Split page
I am working on a table that includes all items that can be crafted with a given material (see User:Ickputzdirwech/Wood for the current progress). Unfortunately it doesn't include the tables, since they have one combined page. I therefore suggest splitting this page. If you have a better solution please let me know, I am fairly unexperienced with wiki templates and that sort of stuff. (I tried adding the information to the redirect pages, but I couldn't get it to work). The argument against splitting this page this would be that the individual pages would have very little information. What is your opinion?--Ickputzdirwech (talk) 10:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- That sounds like a good idea to me, you're absolutely right that it'd make templating far far easier to do. To the point where it will probably be necessary eventually anyway. I don't think you can make the redirects work while retaiing hte redict - the property calls will also always follow the redirect afaik. If you're happy to do the split, just have a central Table page, that links to the others and the info common to all variants (e.g. Sculpture or Fine carpet) , and then individual pages with the in-game names for each of the actual versions. If you're not comfortable doing it, you'll have to wait until I'm free next which might be as late as next week. Harakoni (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)