Difference between revisions of "Nutrient paste meal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Removed redirect, this is the proper page.) |
(Moved content from Nutrient paste dispenser. Due to the misplaced redirect, next step is to bring all the content from the capitalized page.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Nutrient paste meals have advantages over meals prepared by a cook. The greatest advantage is that it is extremely efficient on food reserves. It only consumes 0.3 nutrition worth of ingredients to produce a meal with 0.9 nutrition, whereas fine meals or pemmican use 0.5 nutrition to provide the same amount. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A second less important advantage is that nutrient paste meals never cause [[Ailments#Food_Poisoning|food poisoning]], while meals prepared by a cook always have a [[Food_Poison_Chance|chance]] of causing food poisoning. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Colonists will prefer eating a simple meal or berries instead of using the dispenser. Using a [[fueled stove]], an [[electric stove]] or even a [[campfire]] provides better meals. | ||
Revision as of 00:52, 8 July 2017
Nutrient paste meals have advantages over meals prepared by a cook. The greatest advantage is that it is extremely efficient on food reserves. It only consumes 0.3 nutrition worth of ingredients to produce a meal with 0.9 nutrition, whereas fine meals or pemmican use 0.5 nutrition to provide the same amount.
A second less important advantage is that nutrient paste meals never cause food poisoning, while meals prepared by a cook always have a chance of causing food poisoning.
Colonists will prefer eating a simple meal or berries instead of using the dispenser. Using a fueled stove, an electric stove or even a campfire provides better meals.