Talk:Mini-turret

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

2600:382:96F3:460E:EDA9:2003:718B:D886 (talkcontribs)

The page specifies that turrets "do benefit from cover", as well as the Version History stating the same, the later providing the only citation on the entire page. However, if you actually look at the Imgur mp4, it clearly shows and specifies in the image title AND URL that mini-turrets DO NOT benefit from cover.

This implies that the claim is false, as dispite the game showing a false <1% chance-to-hit, anyone who actually looks at the source would realize that, out of the 8-9 shots fired AT the turret (destroying the turret), a total of 0 shots actually missed the target.

Harakoni (talkcontribs)

Thats because that video is showing the empirical testing done prior to the fix. Probably should be more clearly worded

Reply to "Citation for proof of cover."
Yoshida Keiji (talkcontribs)

Honestly, I think User:Someone pictures are better than PigeonGuru ones, for the reason that the sandbags were laid with inclusion of the Planning Grid which makes it very easy to count space by just seeing how many white squares are to each direction from the point of origin. I don't understand how power lines makes counting easier.

09:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

PigeonGuru (talkcontribs)

I thought it might be harder to see the area affected by the blast- the damage textures may not be as obvious, while for destroyed power conduits it is very easily seen.

That said, if visibility is not an issue then reverting to the original is a better idea, I kept the originals up. Alternatively I might also add the planning grid as well.

Reply to "Images representing range"
There are no older topics