Re This edit which inverts the behaviour of #. Did you check the other templates and calls besides market value to see if any were broken by the change? Losing the formatting when used in-line is not ideal but not a big issue, its mostly where it already had a # that I'm concerned about.
Topic on User talk:Ickputzdirwech
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I thought about this again and I'll just revert the edit you mentioned. I didn't know that quite so many pages used display formats. It was meant to be an easy solution for issues following the data type change of Property:Work To Build Offset. It is probably best if the display format is set on a case by case basis.
Sorry for the trouble!