User talk:Ilysen

I'll admit, when I saw "this whole section kind of sucked for a bunch of reasons, imo" in one of the edit summaries of recent changes I had a moment of chagrin wondering if you meant my writing. It turns out I wasn't involved, but I probably would've been discouraged and angry if someone had said something I wrote sucked.

yeah, I'm sorry, you're probably right. I didn't mean anything *personal* by it, or anything; the section seemed pretty old and so I figured nobody would have a problem with it - the flow was a bit awkward, and I just generally found the use of the term "nuggetize" to be bad for a few reasons (mostly that it was distasteful, but also because using a slang term for a technical analysis felt dodgy) but you're right that I probably shouldn't have been so callous about it. I'll try n do better about that sort of thing in the future

I think it was a good edit done for good reasons! I just saw the potential for future hurt feelings and wanted to bring it to your attention. I have full confidence that you had pure intentions.

Keep up the good work, we need all the help we can get here :D

Just wanted to drop in and say hi and welcome to the wiki! Absolute bangers for your first edits - some of the Anomaly pages especially are a rough because the entities have so many unique mechanics so its much appreciated. I'm one of the moderators around here, so lemme know if you have any questions or need a hand with anything.

Oh actually I do have one question - why change links like [[skull]]s (which displays as skulls) to [[skull|skulls]] (which also displays as skulls)?

thank you!! I was worried I was being overly broad in scope for my first few edits honestly- I just tend to run with concepts and by the time I realize where I am, I've rewritten a whole bunch. i'm glad it's been hopefully helpful

to answer your question: that would entirely be because I didn't realize, oops. I thought for certain that I'd made sure to verify that and apparently I didn't, so that's my bad. I'll avoid it in the future

No, absolutely not too broad! We don't want editors to burn themselves out or anything, but more high quality edits are always a good thing and yours have been well written and researched.

And no worries re: the links. There's always little things that catch you out at first when you try something new.

Anyway, just wanted to check in. You shouldn't have to wait for moderation now. See you round the wiki!

thank you a lot! i'll try my best