Difference between revisions of "Camelhide"

From RimWorld Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Category:Material)
Line 50: Line 50:
  
 
{{nav|materials|wide}}
 
{{nav|materials|wide}}
 +
[[Category:Material]]

Revision as of 16:28, 4 October 2021

Camelhide

Camelhide b.png

Tanned, dried, scraped camel skin. Good at temperature regulation in hot climates.


Type
TextileLeather
Stack Limit
75

Base Stats

Flammability
1
Market Value
2.3
Mass
0.03
Max Hit Points
60
... further results

Stat Modifiers

Armor - Blunt
×0.24
Armor - Heat
×1.5
Armor - Sharp
×0.81
Flammability
×1
Insulation - Cold
×16
Insulation - Heat
×24
Max Hit Points
×1.3
... further results

Camelhide is a type of leather produced when a cook butchers a dromedary or an alpaca at a butcher table.

Acquisition

The following animals provide Camelhide.

  • Animal Leather Yield
    Alpaca 40
    Dromedary 84
  • Analysis

    Camelhide is one of many textiles with stats almost identical to plainleather, only diverging in having better heat insulation and slightly higher market value and beauty factor. In this way, it can be considered the heat focused counterpart to Bluefur

    As it is 6-way tied for the 11th most protective textile in the game, it is largely irrelevant as protective clothing after the very early game, and even at that point there are many other options that are just as good or better. However, camelhide's heat insulation is exceptional, in a 3-way tie for second most heat insulative. This means that unlike comparably protective textiles, it can retain its utility into the mid-game in some biomes. Transitioning to Devilstrand, which is as insulative and significantly more protective, should be made a priority however. When the absolute maximum heat insulation is not a necessity, more protective textiles should be adopted as soon as possible.

    For use in furniture, it only has a slightly improved beauty factor than other common textiles, but its mid-game redundancy as clothing makes it a decent choice for improving furniture beauty. Its inferiority to wools in this regard and the commonness of wools compared to camelhide limits its long term utility however.