Difference between revisions of "Mace"
(I'll do more clean-up, but get a spear section done) |
(clean up) |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
== Comparisons == | == Comparisons == | ||
===Compared to spear=== | ===Compared to spear=== | ||
− | Before considering armor, spears deal more raw damage. A steel spear deals {{+|{{%| 7.88/7.01 -1 round 3}}}} more {{DPS}} than a steel mace of equal quality. A [[plasteel]] spear does {{+|{{%| 10.55/9.56 -1 round 3}}}} of a uranium mace. | + | Before considering armor, spears deal more raw damage. A steel spear deals {{+|{{%| 7.88/7.01 -1 round 3}}}} more {{DPS}} than a steel mace of equal quality. A [[plasteel]] spear does {{+|{{%| 10.55/9.56 -1 round 3}}}} of a uranium mace. While spears fare worse against armor, they have high {{AP}}. A plasteel spear has 55% AP on its only "Sharp" attack, meaning it ignores all Sharp armor below 55%. |
− | + | So at normal quality, a plasteel spear deals more damage than a [[uranium]] mace until fighting enemies with {{%| (9.56/10.55 -1)/(-0.75) + 0.55 round 2}} <!-- | |
We are solving for 1 / (Spear DPS Improvement%) = (Armor Reduction%). We can get DPS Improvement using (DPS Spear / DPS Mace). For armor, we know that 1% AP reduces 1% of armor, and 1% of armor equals -0.75% damage, which is subtracted from 100% damage. Since spear's only Sharp attack has 55% AP, we use that instead of spear's avg AP. | We are solving for 1 / (Spear DPS Improvement%) = (Armor Reduction%). We can get DPS Improvement using (DPS Spear / DPS Mace). For armor, we know that 1% AP reduces 1% of armor, and 1% of armor equals -0.75% damage, which is subtracted from 100% damage. Since spear's only Sharp attack has 55% AP, we use that instead of spear's avg AP. | ||
Sub variables in and you get (9.56 / 10.55) = (100 - 0.75(x - 55))%. Solve for x and we get (9.56 / 10.55 - 1) / -0.75 = (x - 0.55), after converting percents into decimals. ---> Sharp armor. This is before considering quality; at higher quality, the spear only gets better. For example, if both weapons are excellent, then the mace only starts to become better at {{%| (11.48/12.63 -1)/(-0.75) + 0.66 round 2}} armor. For reference, [[centipede]]s have 72% armor. | Sub variables in and you get (9.56 / 10.55) = (100 - 0.75(x - 55))%. Solve for x and we get (9.56 / 10.55 - 1) / -0.75 = (x - 0.55), after converting percents into decimals. ---> Sharp armor. This is before considering quality; at higher quality, the spear only gets better. For example, if both weapons are excellent, then the mace only starts to become better at {{%| (11.48/12.63 -1)/(-0.75) + 0.66 round 2}} armor. For reference, [[centipede]]s have 72% armor. | ||
− | Maces would remain better against [[flak vest]]s and [[power armor]]. Of these, the flak vest only matters if you actually ''hit'' the vest, which only covers the torso and neck. Power armor, as mentioned above, are rare enemies in practice. Spears are noticeably better against unarmored & lightly armored targets. They are roughly equal to the mace against centipedes. Since spears are ''more useful against more targets'', without compromising performance against armor, they are often a better weapon ''in practice''. (If you happened to fight a lot of power armor enemies, maces would come on top). | + | Maces would remain better against [[flak vest]]s and [[power armor]]. Of these, the flak vest only matters if you actually ''hit'' the vest, which only covers the torso and neck. Power armor, as mentioned above, are rare enemies in practice. Spears are noticeably better against unarmored & lightly armored targets. They are roughly equal to the mace against centipedes. |
+ | |||
+ | Since spears are ''more useful against more targets'', without compromising performance against medium armor, they are often a better weapon ''in practice''. (If you happened to fight a lot of power armor enemies, maces would come on top). | ||
The big advantage of the mace is that it's cheaper. It costs {{icon small|stuff}} 25 material less. They are unlocked with [[Research#Smithing|Smithing]] rather than [[Research#Long blades|Long Blades]]. [[Uranium]] is cheaper than [[plasteel]], and much less useful in the early- and mid-game. | The big advantage of the mace is that it's cheaper. It costs {{icon small|stuff}} 25 material less. They are unlocked with [[Research#Smithing|Smithing]] rather than [[Research#Long blades|Long Blades]]. [[Uranium]] is cheaper than [[plasteel]], and much less useful in the early- and mid-game. | ||
Line 67: | Line 69: | ||
===Compared to longswords=== | ===Compared to longswords=== | ||
− | + | Like the spear, the [[longsword]] is a sharp weapon. Steel longswords are about {{%| 7.96/7.01 -1 round 3}} stronger than steel maces. Plasteel longswords are {{%| 10.71/9.56 -1 round 3}} stronger than uranium maces. Additionally, longswords have the advantage of the ''[[Damage Types#Cut|Cut]]'' damage type, which does bonus cleaving damage. But pawns tend to have much lower Blunt armor than they do sharp. This results in armor being the main determinant in this comparison. | |
+ | |||
+ | The exact breakpoints vary on [[quality]] and material. In general, a normal [[plasteel]] longsword can beat a normal [[uranium]] mace against targets wearing just [[flak jacket]]s or [[flak pants]], as well as unarmored pawns. Armor pieces like [[flak vest]]s and [[power armor]] reduce the longsword to the point of being worse than the mace. | ||
− | + | Blunt damage has a few minor advantages, which is listed in the [[Damage Types#Blunt|Blunt]] weapon page. | |
− | + | ===Compared to other blunt weapons=== | |
− | + | ====Clubs==== | |
− | + | Compared to its neolithic 'ancestor', the [[club]], the mace is 10 units more expensive, has a greater damage per hit, and swings just as fast. However, maces areimpacted by [[quality]], while clubs aren't. A poor or awful mace will be worse than a club of the same material. In contrast, a good mace will clearly outperfo rm a club. | |
− | |||
− | + | ====Warhammers==== | |
+ | The [[warhammer]]{{RoyaltyIcon}} costs 3x the materials and requires [[Research#Long Blades|Long blades]] researched. However, it isn't conventionally stronger. The mace is actually {{%| 9.56/9.31 round 3}} stronger, in raw {{DPS}}, than the warhammer. The warhammer has slightly more {{AP}}, but a uranium mace already has such high AP, that no reasonable enemy can resist it. | ||
− | + | The warhammer's big advantage, is that it swings slower, but with a stronger hit. This makes it more likely to destroy body parts. The effect of this heavily depends on quality and damage output | |
− | |||
− | The | + | *'''At normal or good quality''', this is almost irrelevant against humans. The mace performs similarly, but is 3x cheaper, so the mace comes out ahead. |
− | + | *'''But at masterwork and legendary quality''', the warhammer's damage matters a lot more. It has enough damage to consistently 1-shot or 2-shot humans. The mace would take 3 hits to down from [[pain]], meaning the mace takes more time to actually kill. The differences are further exasperated with the [[Genes#Strong melee damage|Strong melee ''damage'' gene]].{{BiotechIcon}} | |
− | + | : Against non-humans, where the warhammer no longer 1-shots enemies, the mace would technically come out ahead. However, the [[spear]] and [[longsword]] deal even more damage. A legendary plasteel spear, in particular, has enough AP to completely ignore the armor of every non-human in the game. | |
{{Weapon Quality Table}} | {{Weapon Quality Table}} |
Revision as of 18:44, 5 March 2023
Mace
A refined club, engineered for efficient swinging and deadly impacts.
Base Stats
Ranged Combat
- Mode
- Melee
Melee Combat
- Mode
- Melee
- Melee Attack 1
- Handle
9 dmg (Poke)
13% AP
2 seconds cooldown - Melee Attack 2
- Head
15.7 dmg (Blunt)
24% AP
2 seconds cooldown
Creation
- Required Research
- Smithing
- Skill Required
- Crafting 3
- Work To Make
- 6,000 ticks (1.67 mins)
- Stuff Tags
- Metallic, Woody
- weaponTags
- MedievalMeleeDecent
The mace is a melee weapon that does a moderate amount of blunt damage, and has a moderate cooldown. As a blunt weapon, mace attacks don't cause bleeding (unless a body part gets destroyed), and generally fares better against armor when compared to sharp weapons.
Acquisition
Maces can be crafted at a Fueled smithy or Electric smithy once the Smithing research project has been completed. They require 50 Stuff (Metallic/Woody, 500 for SMVs), 6,000 ticks (1.67 mins) of work, and a Crafting skill of 3.
Maces can also be purchased from outlander and orbital combat suppliers, or from outlander and pirate raiders drops.
Analysis
Maces are the strongest blunt weapon that can be crafted by your colony without the Royalty DLC.
The mace is best when made with uranium, due to the metal's blunt damage multiplier.
Blunt weapons are often seen as "anti-armor" weapons, due to the tiny amounts of Blunt armor that most enemies have. In this role, the mace faces heavy competition with the spear. This is because enemies with especially strong armor are quite rare in practice.
Comparisons
Compared to spear
Before considering armor, spears deal more raw damage. A steel spear deals +12.4% more DPS than a steel mace of equal quality. A plasteel spear does +10.4% of a uranium mace. While spears fare worse against armor, they have high AP. A plasteel spear has 55% AP on its only "Sharp" attack, meaning it ignores all Sharp armor below 55%.
So at normal quality, a plasteel spear deals more damage than a uranium mace until fighting enemies with 68% Sharp armor. This is before considering quality; at higher quality, the spear only gets better. For example, if both weapons are excellent, then the mace only starts to become better at 78% armor. For reference, centipedes have 72% armor.
Maces would remain better against flak vests and power armor. Of these, the flak vest only matters if you actually hit the vest, which only covers the torso and neck. Power armor, as mentioned above, are rare enemies in practice. Spears are noticeably better against unarmored & lightly armored targets. They are roughly equal to the mace against centipedes.
Since spears are more useful against more targets, without compromising performance against medium armor, they are often a better weapon in practice. (If you happened to fight a lot of power armor enemies, maces would come on top).
The big advantage of the mace is that it's cheaper. It costs 25 material less. They are unlocked with Smithing rather than Long Blades. Uranium is cheaper than plasteel, and much less useful in the early- and mid-game.
This comparison falls off at Masterwork quality or higher, but it's not due to armor. Instead, it's due to the overkill mechanics of both weapons.
- The spear, as Stab damage, can only ever hit a single body part. If a 42 damage spear hits a 25 damage arm, the arm is destroyed. Overkill damage, i.e. 17 damage ( 60% of the attack), is completely wasted.
- The mace, as Blunt damage, will spread damage if it causes overkill. If a mace destroys the arm, it will damage the shoulder, too.
This results in the mace better against humans, and the spear being better against centipedes.
Compared to longswords
Like the spear, the longsword is a sharp weapon. Steel longswords are about 13.6% stronger than steel maces. Plasteel longswords are 12% stronger than uranium maces. Additionally, longswords have the advantage of the Cut damage type, which does bonus cleaving damage. But pawns tend to have much lower Blunt armor than they do sharp. This results in armor being the main determinant in this comparison.
The exact breakpoints vary on quality and material. In general, a normal plasteel longsword can beat a normal uranium mace against targets wearing just flak jackets or flak pants, as well as unarmored pawns. Armor pieces like flak vests and power armor reduce the longsword to the point of being worse than the mace.
Blunt damage has a few minor advantages, which is listed in the Blunt weapon page.
Compared to other blunt weapons
Clubs
Compared to its neolithic 'ancestor', the club, the mace is 10 units more expensive, has a greater damage per hit, and swings just as fast. However, maces areimpacted by quality, while clubs aren't. A poor or awful mace will be worse than a club of the same material. In contrast, a good mace will clearly outperfo rm a club.
Warhammers
The warhammer costs 3x the materials and requires Long blades researched. However, it isn't conventionally stronger. The mace is actually 102.7% stronger, in raw DPS, than the warhammer. The warhammer has slightly more AP, but a uranium mace already has such high AP, that no reasonable enemy can resist it.
The warhammer's big advantage, is that it swings slower, but with a stronger hit. This makes it more likely to destroy body parts. The effect of this heavily depends on quality and damage output
- At normal or good quality, this is almost irrelevant against humans. The mace performs similarly, but is 3x cheaper, so the mace comes out ahead.
- But at masterwork and legendary quality, the warhammer's damage matters a lot more. It has enough damage to consistently 1-shot or 2-shot humans. The mace would take 3 hits to down from pain, meaning the mace takes more time to actually kill. The differences are further exasperated with the Strong melee damage gene.
- Against non-humans, where the warhammer no longer 1-shots enemies, the mace would technically come out ahead. However, the spear and longsword deal even more damage. A legendary plasteel spear, in particular, has enough AP to completely ignore the armor of every non-human in the game.
Attack table
Feature | Toggle |
---|---|
Attacks | |
Quality |
Mace | Handle (Poke) | Head (Blunt) | Human: Left & right fist (Blunt) | HP | Value | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Material | DPS[1] | AP[1] | Dam. | Cool. | AP | DPS | Chance[2] | Dam. | Cool. | AP | DPS | Chance[2] | Dam. | Cool. | AP | DPS | Chance[2] | ||
Awful | Bioferrite | 5.19 | 15.74% | 6.48 | 2s | 9.36% | 3.24 | 8.33% | 11.3 | 2s | 17.28% | 5.65 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 200 | 46 |
Awful | Gold | 5.69 | 17.27% | 7.2 | 2s | 10.4% | 3.6 | 8.33% | 12.56 | 2s | 19.2% | 6.28 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 60 | 2510 |
Awful | Plasteel | 6.23 | 15.74% | 6.48 | 1.6s | 9.36% | 4.05 | 8.33% | 11.3 | 1.6s | 17.28% | 7.07 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 280 | 250 |
Awful | Silver | 5.69 | 17.27% | 7.2 | 2s | 10.4% | 3.6 | 8.33% | 12.56 | 2s | 19.2% | 6.28 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 70 | 260 |
Awful | Steel | 5.69 | 17.27% | 7.2 | 2s | 10.4% | 3.6 | 8.33% | 12.56 | 2s | 19.2% | 6.28 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 100 | 58 |
Awful | Uranium | 7.57 | 24.9% | 10.8 | 2.2s | 15.6% | 4.91 | 8.33% | 18.84 | 2.2s | 28.8% | 8.56 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 250 | 171 |
Awful | Wood | 5.19 | 15.74% | 6.48 | 2s | 9.36% | 3.24 | 8.33% | 11.3 | 2s | 17.28% | 5.65 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 65 | 38 |
Poor | Bioferrite | 5.76 | 17.46% | 7.29 | 2s | 10.53% | 3.65 | 8.33% | 12.72 | 2s | 19.44% | 6.36 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 200 | 69 |
Poor | Gold | 6.32 | 19.18% | 8.1 | 2s | 11.7% | 4.05 | 8.33% | 14.13 | 2s | 21.6% | 7.07 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 60 | 3765 |
Poor | Plasteel | 6.91 | 17.46% | 7.29 | 1.6s | 10.53% | 4.56 | 8.33% | 12.72 | 1.6s | 19.44% | 7.95 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 280 | 375 |
Poor | Silver | 6.32 | 19.18% | 8.1 | 2s | 11.7% | 4.05 | 8.33% | 14.13 | 2s | 21.6% | 7.07 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 70 | 390 |
Poor | Steel | 6.32 | 19.18% | 8.1 | 2s | 11.7% | 4.05 | 8.33% | 14.13 | 2s | 21.6% | 7.07 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 100 | 87 |
Poor | Uranium | 8.43 | 27.76% | 12.15 | 2.2s | 17.55% | 5.52 | 8.33% | 21.2 | 2.2s | 32.4% | 9.63 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 250 | 255 |
Poor | Wood | 5.76 | 17.46% | 7.29 | 2s | 10.53% | 3.65 | 8.33% | 12.72 | 2s | 19.44% | 6.36 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 65 | 56 |
Normal | Bioferrite | 6.32 | 19.18% | 8.1 | 2s | 11.7% | 4.05 | 8.33% | 14.13 | 2s | 21.6% | 7.07 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 200 | 92 |
Normal | Gold | 6.95 | 21.08% | 9 | 2s | 13% | 4.5 | 8.33% | 15.7 | 2s | 24% | 7.85 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 60 | 5020 |
Normal | Plasteel | 7.58 | 19.18% | 8.1 | 1.6s | 11.7% | 5.06 | 8.33% | 14.13 | 1.6s | 21.6% | 8.83 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 280 | 495 |
Normal | Silver | 6.95 | 21.08% | 9 | 2s | 13% | 4.5 | 8.33% | 15.7 | 2s | 24% | 7.85 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 70 | 520 |
Normal | Steel | 6.95 | 21.08% | 9 | 2s | 13% | 4.5 | 8.33% | 15.7 | 2s | 24% | 7.85 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 100 | 117 |
Normal | Uranium | 9.3 | 30.63% | 13.5 | 2.2s | 19.5% | 6.14 | 8.33% | 23.55 | 2.2s | 36% | 10.7 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 250 | 340 |
Normal | Wood | 6.32 | 19.18% | 8.1 | 2s | 11.7% | 4.05 | 8.33% | 14.13 | 2s | 21.6% | 7.07 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 65 | 75 |
Good | Bioferrite | 6.88 | 20.89% | 8.91 | 2s | 12.87% | 4.46 | 8.33% | 15.54 | 2s | 23.76% | 7.77 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 200 | 114 |
Good | Gold | 7.57 | 22.99% | 9.9 | 2s | 14.3% | 4.95 | 8.33% | 17.27 | 2s | 26.4% | 8.64 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 60 | 5520 |
Good | Plasteel | 8.26 | 20.89% | 8.91 | 1.6s | 12.87% | 5.57 | 8.33% | 15.54 | 1.6s | 23.76% | 9.71 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 280 | 620 |
Good | Silver | 7.57 | 22.99% | 9.9 | 2s | 14.3% | 4.95 | 8.33% | 17.27 | 2s | 26.4% | 8.64 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 70 | 650 |
Good | Steel | 7.57 | 22.99% | 9.9 | 2s | 14.3% | 4.95 | 8.33% | 17.27 | 2s | 26.4% | 8.64 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 100 | 146 |
Good | Uranium | 10.17 | 33.49% | 14.85 | 2.2s | 21.45% | 6.75 | 8.33% | 25.91 | 2.2s | 39.6% | 11.78 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 250 | 425 |
Good | Wood | 6.88 | 20.89% | 8.91 | 2s | 12.87% | 4.46 | 8.33% | 15.54 | 2s | 23.76% | 7.77 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 65 | 94 |
Excellent | Bioferrite | 7.45 | 22.61% | 9.72 | 2s | 14.04% | 4.86 | 8.33% | 16.96 | 2s | 25.92% | 8.48 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 200 | 137 |
Excellent | Gold | 8.2 | 24.9% | 10.8 | 2s | 15.6% | 5.4 | 8.33% | 18.84 | 2s | 28.8% | 9.42 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 60 | 6020 |
Excellent | Plasteel | 8.94 | 22.61% | 9.72 | 1.6s | 14.04% | 6.08 | 8.33% | 16.96 | 1.6s | 25.92% | 10.6 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 280 | 745 |
Excellent | Silver | 8.2 | 24.9% | 10.8 | 2s | 15.6% | 5.4 | 8.33% | 18.84 | 2s | 28.8% | 9.42 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 70 | 780 |
Excellent | Steel | 8.2 | 24.9% | 10.8 | 2s | 15.6% | 5.4 | 8.33% | 18.84 | 2s | 28.8% | 9.42 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 100 | 175 |
Excellent | Uranium | 11.04 | 36.35% | 16.2 | 2.2s | 23.4% | 7.36 | 8.33% | 28.26 | 2.2s | 43.2% | 12.85 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 250 | 510 |
Excellent | Wood | 7.45 | 22.61% | 9.72 | 2s | 14.04% | 4.86 | 8.33% | 16.96 | 2s | 25.92% | 8.48 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 65 | 113 |
Masterwork | Bioferrite | 8.86 | 26.9% | 11.75 | 2s | 16.97% | 5.87 | 8.33% | 20.49 | 2s | 31.32% | 10.24 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 200 | 230 |
Masterwork | Gold | 9.76 | 29.67% | 13.05 | 2s | 18.85% | 6.53 | 8.33% | 22.77 | 2s | 34.8% | 11.38 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 60 | 7020 |
Masterwork | Plasteel | 10.63 | 26.9% | 11.75 | 1.6s | 16.97% | 7.34 | 8.33% | 20.49 | 1.6s | 31.32% | 12.81 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 280 | 1245 |
Masterwork | Silver | 9.76 | 29.67% | 13.05 | 2s | 18.85% | 6.53 | 8.33% | 22.77 | 2s | 34.8% | 11.38 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 70 | 1305 |
Masterwork | Steel | 9.76 | 29.67% | 13.05 | 2s | 18.85% | 6.53 | 8.33% | 22.77 | 2s | 34.8% | 11.38 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 100 | 290 |
Masterwork | Uranium | 13.87 | 46.22% | 19.58 | 2.2s | 28.28% | 8.9 | 25% | 34.15 | 2.2s | 52.2% | 15.52 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 0% | 250 | 850 |
Masterwork | Wood | 8.86 | 26.9% | 11.75 | 2s | 16.97% | 5.87 | 8.33% | 20.49 | 2s | 31.32% | 10.24 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 65 | 188 |
Legendary | Bioferrite | 9.98 | 30.34% | 13.37 | 2s | 19.31% | 6.68 | 8.33% | 23.31 | 2s | 35.64% | 11.66 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 200 | 455 |
Legendary | Gold | 11.02 | 33.49% | 14.85 | 2s | 21.45% | 7.43 | 8.33% | 25.91 | 2s | 39.6% | 12.95 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 60 | 8020 |
Legendary | Plasteel | 13.02 | 31.56% | 13.37 | 1.6s | 19.31% | 8.35 | 25% | 23.31 | 1.6s | 35.64% | 14.57 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 0% | 280 | 2485 |
Legendary | Silver | 11.02 | 33.49% | 14.85 | 2s | 21.45% | 7.43 | 8.33% | 25.91 | 2s | 39.6% | 12.95 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 70 | 2610 |
Legendary | Steel | 11.02 | 33.49% | 14.85 | 2s | 21.45% | 7.43 | 8.33% | 25.91 | 2s | 39.6% | 12.95 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 100 | 585 |
Legendary | Uranium | 15.78 | 52.59% | 22.28 | 2.2s | 32.18% | 10.13 | 25% | 38.86 | 2.2s | 59.4% | 17.66 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 0% | 250 | 1705 |
Legendary | Wood | 9.98 | 30.34% | 13.37 | 2s | 19.31% | 6.68 | 8.33% | 23.31 | 2s | 35.64% | 11.66 | 75% | 8.2 | 2s | 12% | 4.1 | 2× 8.33% | 65 | 375 |
For the full effects of qualities, see Quality.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Note: This is the actual base average derived from the melee verb system updated in 1.1.2610, it may sometimes disagree with the listed value in the in-game infobox.
It may also change depending on the stats and the melee verbs available to the wielder if the weapon is wielded by some other than a baseline human. - ↑ Chance for attack to be selected, assuming the weapon is wielded by a baseline human. It may change depending on the melee verbs available to the wielder
Version history
- Beta 19/1.0 - Damage buffed.